In other news, there will soon be some updates on our officer page. When we officially incorporated the Society in 2008, we drafted by-laws with terms for the officers: three years for the President and seven years for the Treasurer and Secretary. In the case of the presidency, the years of service coincide with the the planning years of the annual conferences that they organize. In my case, this would be the year before the Barcelona 2020 conference, followed by Taipei 2021, and then completed the year before Cartagena 2022. As all of you know, this is not how the movie turned out. But I’m happy to report that we are still planning to have meetings in Cartagena (2023), Barcelona (2024), and Taipei (2025). Furthermore, it will be a joint effort between me and the recently announced President-elect: Juan Pablo Nicolini (Minneapolis Fed/Di Tella). Juan Pablo will co-serve during the meetings originally planned by me before taking over fully to organize the 2026-2028 meetings. Erwan Quintin (Wisconsin), who has served as Treasurer since 2015, is completing his last year. I am extremely grateful for all of the help he has given to me and to the Society. Thankfully, Todd Schoellman (Minneapolis Fed) has agreed to serve as the next Treasurer and is already learning the ropes from Erwan. Marina Azzimonti (Stony Brook) will stay on for another year so that there is not too much depletion of our institutional knowledge. Loukas Karabarbounis (Minnesota) has also agreed to stay on for another term as Coordinating Editor at the Review of Economic Dynamics.
Finally, I want to thank the ASSA 2022 webinar organizers— Ludwig Straub (Harvard), Hanno Lustig (Stanford), and Kyle Herkenhoff (Minnesota) for there efforts in putting together the winter SED sessions. If you missed them, you can check them out on YouTube.
A journey through the history of inflation and government debt in Latin America. The compilation of Kehoe and Nicolini unifies the volatile experiences of these countries using theory and data, and challenges us with unanswered questions. A must read for scholars interested in monetary and fiscal policy!
What went wrong with the economic development of Latin America over the past half-century? Along with periods of poor economic performance, the region’s countries have been plagued by a wide variety of economic crises. This major new work brings together dozens of leading economists to explore the economic performance of the ten largest countries in South America and of Mexico. Together they advance the fundamental hypothesis that, despite different manifestations, these crises all have been the result of poorly designed or poorly implemented fiscal and monetary policies.
Each country is treated in its own section of the book, with a lead chapter presenting a comprehensive database of the country’s fiscal, monetary, and economic data from 1960 to 2017. The chapters are drawn from one-day academic conferences—hosted in all but one case, in the focus country—with participants including noted economists and former leading policy makers. Cowritten with Nobel Prize winner Thomas J. Sargent, the editors’ introduction provides a conceptual framework for analyzing fiscal and monetary policy in countries around the world, particularly those less developed. A final chapter draws conclusions and suggests directions for further research.
A vital resource for advanced undergraduate and graduate students of economics and for economic researchers and policy makers, A Monetary and Fiscal History of Latin America, 1960–2017 goes further than any book in stressing both the singularities and the similarities of the economic histories of Latin America’s largest countries.
For decades, workers have been missing out on many of the gains of economic growth, and countless analyses have been published to explain why. Though the problem is fundamentally economic, it cannot be understood without also accounting for technology, politics, and culture.
A sharply argued thesis that one effect of all-powerful corporations is the suppression of wages for working people across the board.
Productivity has risen markedly since 1980, writes Barcelona-based economist Eeckhout, “yet what most workers get in exchange for producing that output has not kept up.” Indeed, wages have fallen, especially for “unskilled workers” and those without a college education. Even skilled professionals are losing ground. Meanwhile, corporations such as Amazon and Google have become near monopolies. The labor share of the economy, as Eeckhout puts it formally—though this book requires no background in economics to understand—was about 65% in 1980 and is below 58% today. “A decline of seven percentage points—or 10 percent—may seem tiny,” he adds, “but that includes the earnings of…top earners, and not just the low-paid workers.” Given the inequalities in today’s winner-take-all economy, workers understandably feel that they have no stake in the game and no vested interest in seeing that the system is maintained, giving rise to political unrest. In a novel, intriguing argument, Eeckhout holds that Amazon and other monopolies could well afford to lower their costs, which would mean more volume, yet they keep their prices high in order to curb demand and keep labor costs down while maintaining market power. The author notes that whereas the two largest retailers before the Depression, Sears and A&P, had a market share of just 3%, Walmart and Amazon today “account for 15 percent of retail sales.” Yet antitrust regulators, as well as politicians of all stripes, are silent. Eeckhout proposes that existing antitrust laws be brought to bear to force higher wages as well as to pry data from the hands of corporations and back into the purview of the consumers who generate it.
A provocative case, and one that those who feel undervalued in the present economy will surely appreciate.